Ice or Heat Therapy: Which One Should You Use?

One of the most common questions I hear from patients is, “Should I use ice or heat?”The short answer is: it depends. Both can be helpful, but in most cases, especially when pain is related to irritation or inflammation, I tend to recommend ice more often than not.

Let’s walk through why, when to use each, and when you should avoid them altogether.

Why Ice Is Often the Better First Choice

When tissue is irritated, whether from an injury, overuse, or a flare-up, the body responds with inflammation. This brings increased blood flow, swelling, and chemical signals that make pain receptors more sensitive. Ice helps control this response by causing vasoconstriction, or narrowing of blood vessels, which limits excessive swelling and calms irritated tissue.

Ice also affects the nervous system. Cold therapy slows nerve conduction velocity, meaning pain signals travel more slowly from the injured area to the brain. This creates a natural numbing effect and can significantly reduce pain, without medication.

The Inflammation Question: Isn’t Inflammation Needed to Heal?

This is a very fair question. Yes, inflammation is necessary for healing; it delivers nutrients and immune cells to injured tissue. The goal of ice therapy isn’t to shut inflammation down completely. It’s to prevent excessive or prolonged inflammation that can increase pain and limit movement.

When inflammation is poorly controlled, it often delays recovery by keeping people stiff, sore, and inactive. Ice helps calm symptoms enough to allow earlier, safer movement.

In my opinion, the benefits of staying active and moving well often outweigh the downside of slightly dampening inflammation. Movement and appropriate loading are some of the strongest drivers of tissue recovery. When pain is reduced, joints move better, muscles activate more normally, and circulation improves through motion itself. Ice helps create a window where movement is possible, rather than being shut down by pain.

When Ice Is Indicated

Ice tends to work best when pain is associated with irritation or inflammation, such as:

• Acute injuries or flare-ups

• Swelling or warmth in a joint or muscle

• Pain that worsens after activity

• Sharp, achy, or irritated pain

  
  

When Ice Should Be Avoided

Ice isn’t appropriate for everyone. You should avoid ice or use it only under professional guidance if you have:

• Poor circulation or vascular disease

• Cold hypersensitivity or cold-induced pain

• Raynaud’s phenomenon

• Areas with impaired sensation or nerve damage

• Open wounds or compromised skin

  
  

If you’re unsure whether ice is safe for you, it’s best to ask your provider first.

How to Use Ice Safely and Effectively

A common recommendation is to use a commercial ice pack, 20 minutes on, 20 minutes off, repeat as necessary. This allows the tissue to cool without over-stressing the skin or nerves. Always place a thin barrier (like a towel) between the ice pack and your skin.

Leaving ice on for too long can actually backfire due to a phenomenon known as the Lewis Hunting response. After prolonged cold exposure, the body responds by increasing blood flow to protect the tissue. A good real-life example is being outside in the cold for too long; your face or nose initially turns pale, then becomes red as blood rushes back in. That rebound circulation is exactly what we’re trying to avoid when managing inflammation, which is why shorter, controlled icing sessions are best.

When Heat Can Be Helpful

Look, I get it, even major organizations recommend heat as a therapeutic intervention for neck pain, back pain, and similar conditions. But here’s the issue: from a physiological standpoint, applying heat to an injury, at least an acute one, makes very little sense. And from a clinical perspective, I’ve seen patients actually worsen their pain with heat. I can’t say the same for ice; I’ve never seen it increase pain.

Heat can have its place, especially when inflammation is minimal. Heat works best for muscle tightness, stiffness, or soreness when the goal is relaxation rather than pain control. It increases blood flow and tissue extensibility, which can feel great, but it can worsen swelling if used too early or on an inflamed area.

Arthritis (if not in a flare-up) is one situation where heat often makes sense, particularly when inflammation levels are relatively low. For arthritic joints, I usually recommend lower levels of heat applied for longer periods, typically 15 to 30 minutes. Heat can help reduce stiffness, especially in the morning or during cold weather, without overstimulating the joint.

When Heat Is Indicated

Heat may be helpful when:

• Muscles feel tight or guarded

• Stiffness is the main complaint

• There is no visible swelling or warmth

• Pain improves with movement

  
  

When Heat Should Be Avoided

Heat should be avoided if there is:

• Active inflammation or swelling

• Recent injury

• Areas with impaired sensation

• Open wounds or skin irritation

Using heat in these situations can increase swelling and prolong symptoms.

A Simple Rule of Thumb

If you’re ever unsure which to use, here’s an easy guideline: If it’s irritated or swollen, ice is usually the safer choice. If it’s stiff, tight, and not inflamed, heat may be appropriate.

Ice and heat both have a role in recovery, but they serve different purposes. In most cases involving inflammation or nerve sensitivity, ice is often the better first option. Heat can be useful in specific situations (particularly chronic stiffness or arthritis) when applied thoughtfully.

If you’re unsure what’s right for your condition, ask your provider. Using the right tool at the right time can make a meaningful difference in how quickly and comfortably you recover.

References

1. Algafly, A. A., & George, K. P. (2007). The effect of cryotherapy on nerve conduction velocity, pain threshold, and pain tolerance. British Journal of Sports Medicine, 41(6), 365–369. https://doi.org/10.1136/bjsm.2006.031237

2. Bleakley, C. M., Costello, J. T., & Glasgow, P. D. (2015). Should athletes return to sport after ice therapy? A systematic review of the effect of local cooling on functional performance. Sports Medicine, 45(9), 1325–1336. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40279-015-0342-4

3. Bleakley, C. M., Glasgow, P., & MacAuley, D. C. (2012). PRICE needs updating, should we call the POLICE? British Journal of Sports Medicine, 46(4), 220–221. https://doi.org/10.1136/bjsports-2011-090297

4. Cameron, M. H. (2018). Physical agents in rehabilitation: An evidence-based approach (5th ed.). Elsevier.

5. Hardy, J. D. (1967). Thermal comfort and the Lewis hunting response. Journal of Applied Physiology, 22(4), 823–830. https://doi.org/10.1152/jappl.1967.22.4.823

6. Hochberg, M. C., Altman, R. D., April, K. T., Benkhalti, M., Guyatt, G., McGowan, J., Towheed, T., Welch, V., Wells, G., & Tugwell, P. (2012). American College of Rheumatology 2012 recommendations for the use of nonpharmacologic and pharmacologic therapies in osteoarthritis of the hand, hip, and knee. Arthritis Care & Research, 64(4), 465–474. https://doi.org/10.1002/acr.21596

7. Knight, K. L., & Draper, D. O. (2013). Therapeutic modalities: The art and science (2nd ed.). Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.

8. Lehmann, J. F., de Lateur, B. J., & Stonebridge, J. S. (1966). Therapeutic heat and cold. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 47(8), 476–486.

9. Meeusen, R., & Lievens, P. (1986). The use of cryotherapy in sports injuries. Sports Medicine, 3(6), 398–414. https://doi.org/10.2165/00007256-198603060-00004